.webp){kind=icon}
.webp){kind=icon}
Build a monthly Meta Ads report: name the client and the month, and Juma pulls live campaign data into a client-ready summary of spend, results, best and worst campaigns, and next-month recommendations.
Name the client and the month, and Juma pulls live campaign data straight from your connected Meta Ads account to build the monthly report. The Flow summarizes total spend, impressions, clicks, and leads with blended CPL, CTR, and CPM, then calls out the best and worst performing campaigns with the metrics behind each and the reason each landed where it did.
The report ends with a full per-campaign breakdown table and three specific, budget-level recommendations for next month. It also flags data-quality issues the numbers alone would hide, like a campaign whose pixel stopped attributing conversions. 400+ marketing teams use Juma to turn a month of ad data into a client-ready report in one chat.
Once the report exists in the chat, turn it into a deck the account manager can present without rebuilding anything. Juma populates a branded slide deck: a summary slide with total spend and results, a best-and-worst campaign slide, the per-campaign table, and a recommendations slide for next month. If the client project holds a template deck, the report drops into that layout so the branding is already right. The team reviews and edits before it goes out, so the story and the framing stay yours.
Turn this monthly Meta Ads report into a client-ready slide deck: a summary slide, a best and worst campaign slide, the per-campaign table, and a recommendations slide.
A single month tells the client what happened. A comparison tells them the direction. Ask Juma to pull the prior period and put the two side by side: spend, leads, and blended CPL month over month, plus which campaigns moved the numbers up or down. The report shows the deltas in plain terms, so the client sees whether last month's changes worked before anyone commits next month's budget. This turns a static monthly report into a running story of what the team is improving.
Compare this month's Meta Ads performance to last month and show what changed: spend, leads, CPL, and which campaigns moved the numbers.
The worst performer in a monthly report is a symptom. This step finds the cause. Ask Juma which campaigns are spending the most for the least return, and get back the reason: targeting that's too broad, creative that stopped converting, a campaign objective set to the wrong action, or a pixel that isn't firing. Naming the root cause tells the team whether to cut, restructure, or fix tracking, not just that a number looks bad. Every call ties back to the campaign's own metrics, so the recommendation holds up when the client asks why.
Find the Meta Ads campaigns spending the most for the least return this month, and tell us whether the cause is targeting, creative, objective, or tracking.
Clients rarely run on one channel, and a Meta-only report can make a channel look good or bad in isolation. Pull Meta Ads, Google Ads, and GA4 together and get one cross-channel report: blended spend and results, cost per lead by channel, and where the same budget worked harder. GA4 adds what happened after the click, so the report connects ad spend to on-site outcomes instead of stopping at the platform's own numbers. Now the recommendation is where next month's budget should sit across channels, not just inside Meta.
Pull our Meta Ads, Google Ads, and GA4 data for last month and build one cross-channel report showing blended spend, results, and cost per lead by channel.
Teams build one Juma project per client and add context over time. Every flow the team runs for that client pulls from the same project. If a project already exists, adding a few reporting details means each monthly report starts from the client's own targets and format instead of generic benchmarks and a blank page.
Performance Targets & Context
Targets by campaign or channel (target CPL, target CPA, ROAS goal, monthly budget caps) and which campaigns matter most. With this in the project, best and worst are judged against the client's goals, and recommendations respect the budget the client actually has.
Report Template
The structure and branding the monthly report should follow: section order, the client's logo and colors, the metrics they care about. With a template in the project, the report comes out in the format the client already expects, whether that's a table, a PDF, or a slide deck.
Client Brief
Business context, product lines, target audience, and what the client counts as a conversion. This gives the report the background to explain why a campaign worked, so recommendations connect to the business, not just the metrics.
Add a short description to each knowledge item in the project's info field so Juma knows what each file holds and when to read it. For example:
Building a client-ready Meta Ads report by hand takes 1.5 to 3 hours per account: exporting the data, formatting a table, picking the best and worst campaigns, and writing the summary and recommendations. Juma pulls the live data and delivers the same report in minutes, so the team reviews and sends instead of assembling from scratch.
Agencies running reports across a dozen client accounts feel it most. A team producing eight to ten monthly reports recovers the better part of two working days each month, and the output is more consistent because the same structure applies to every account. With unlimited seats and credit-based pricing, adding another account or another teammate to the workspace doesn't add a per-seat fee.
The report opens with an overall summary: total spend, impressions, clicks, and leads with blended CPL, CTR, and CPM. It then names the best performing campaign with its metrics and why it worked, the worst performing campaign with its metrics and the root cause, a full per-campaign breakdown table, any flagged data-quality issues, and three specific recommendations for next month.
The best and worst sections do more than rank. They explain. A worst performer might trace to an objective mismatch, where the campaign was set to drive the wrong action, so the fix is clear rather than just "spend less here." The recommendations are budget-level and specific, tied to the numbers in the report so the team can present them to the client with confidence.
The data-quality flag is the part manual reporting usually misses. If a campaign's pixel stopped attributing conversions, the raw numbers make it look like a failure. The report calls that out, so the team fixes tracking instead of cutting a campaign that was actually working.
The simplest setup is a connected Meta Ads account. Juma pulls live campaign insights, spend, and conversion data for the month automatically, with no export step. If you'd rather not connect the account, upload a standard Meta Ads export and the report runs from that file instead. The output is the same either way.
For live data, the Meta Ads integration reads campaign performance directly at the time the Flow runs, so the report reflects the current state of the account. This is the setup we'd recommend for teams running monthly reports across several client accounts, since there's no manual export to repeat each month.
Data visibility matches your own access in Meta Ads. Juma connects at the user level and reads what that account can see, and the connection works across every project and chat in the workspace.
Yes. Add your report template to the client project, with the section order, metrics, and branding you present in, and the monthly report comes out in that format. Juma can deliver the report as a table in chat, a PDF, or a populated slide deck, so it's ready to send without reformatting.
The template also keeps reporting consistent across the whole client roster. When every account manager works from the same project template, the June report and the July report match, and a report for one client reads like a report for another. The team sets the format once, and Juma follows it every month.
Ads Manager shows the metrics. This Flow turns them into a client-ready story: it ranks best and worst campaigns with the reason behind each, flags tracking gaps that make Ads Manager undercount results, and writes three budget-level recommendations for next month. Ads Manager reports what happened; the Flow explains it and says what to do next.
Juma augments the team, it doesn't replace it. The Flow does the pulling, the formatting, and the first-draft analysis, and the team brings the strategy and the client relationship. Strategy, taste, and judgment stay human, with review on every report before it goes out, which is one reason 400+ marketing teams rate Juma 4.9 on G2.
This is one of 700+ pre-built Flows, so the same connected Meta Ads account also feeds creative analysis, budget audits, and cross-channel reporting with Google Ads and GA4. The monthly report is the entry point, not the ceiling.
Connect the client's Google Ads, Meta Ads, and GA4 accounts, name the period, and get a branded multi-channel report with scorecards, benchmark context, and a prioritised action plan.
400+ marketing teams trust Juma. ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity know why. Ask them.
Ready when you are
Start typing a task and Juma will figure out the rest.
